| ||||||||||||||||||||||
 
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
  | ||||||||||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 |  AN ACT concerning safety.
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 |  Be it enacted by the People of the State of Illinois,
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | represented in the General Assembly:
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 4 |  Section 5. The Illinois Solid Waste Management Act is  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | amended by changing Section 2 and by adding Section 4.1 as  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | follows:
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 7 |  (415 ILCS 20/2) (from Ch. 111 1/2, par. 7052)
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 8 |  Sec. 2. Public Policy. (a) The General Assembly finds:
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 9 |  (1) that current solid waste disposal practices are not  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 10 | adequate to
address the needs of many metropolitan areas in  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 11 | Illinois;
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 12 |  (2) that the generation of solid waste is increasing while  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 13 | landfill
capacity is decreasing;
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 14 |  (3) that siting of new landfills, transfer stations,  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 15 | incinerators,
recycling facilities, or other solid waste  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 16 | management facilities and the
expansion of existing facilities  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 17 | is very difficult due to the public
concern and competition  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 18 | with other land uses for suitable sites;
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 19 |  (4) that more effective and efficient management of solid  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 20 | waste is
needed in a manner that promotes economic development,  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 21 | protects the
environment and public health and safety, and  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 22 | allows the most practical and
beneficial use of the material  | |||||||||||||||||||||
| 23 | and energy values of solid waste;
 | |||||||||||||||||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  (5) that state government policy and programs should be  | ||||||
| 2 | developed to
assist local governments and private industry in  | ||||||
| 3 | seeking solutions to solid
waste management problems;
 | ||||||
| 4 |  (6) that the purchase of products or supplies made from  | ||||||
| 5 | recycled
materials by public agencies in the State will divert  | ||||||
| 6 | significant
quantities of waste from landfills, reduce  | ||||||
| 7 | disposal costs and stimulate
recycling markets, thereby  | ||||||
| 8 | encouraging the further use of recycled
materials and educating  | ||||||
| 9 | the public about the utility and availability of
such  | ||||||
| 10 | materials;
 | ||||||
| 11 |  (7) that there are wastes for which combustion would not  | ||||||
| 12 | provide
practical energy recovery or practical volume  | ||||||
| 13 | reduction, which cannot be
reasonably recycled or reused and  | ||||||
| 14 | which have reduced environmental threat
because they are  | ||||||
| 15 | non-putrescible, homogeneous and do not contain free
liquids.  | ||||||
| 16 | Such wastes bear a real and substantial difference under the
 | ||||||
| 17 | purposes of the Illinois Solid Waste Management Act from solid  | ||||||
| 18 | wastes for
which combustion would provide practical energy  | ||||||
| 19 | recovery or practical
volume reduction, which can be reasonably  | ||||||
| 20 | recycled or reused, or which are
putrescible, non-homogeneous  | ||||||
| 21 | or contain free liquids;
 | ||||||
| 22 |  (8) since it is the policy of the State as set forth in the
 | ||||||
| 23 | Environmental Protection Act to assure that contaminants  | ||||||
| 24 | discharged into
the atmosphere or waters of the State are given  | ||||||
| 25 | the degree of treatment or
control necessary to prevent  | ||||||
| 26 | pollution, that wastes generated as a result
of removing  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | contaminants from the air, water or land bear a real and
 | ||||||
| 2 | substantial difference from other wastes in that the generation  | ||||||
| 3 | of wastes
containing pollution treatment residuals can improve  | ||||||
| 4 | the environment in
Illinois and should be encouraged;
 | ||||||
| 5 |  (9) since it is the policy of the State as set forth in the
 | ||||||
| 6 | Environmental Protection Act to promote conservation of  | ||||||
| 7 | natural resources
and minimize environmental damage by  | ||||||
| 8 | encouraging and effecting recycling
and reuse of waste  | ||||||
| 9 | materials, that wastes from recycling, reclamation or
reuse  | ||||||
| 10 | processes designed to remove contaminants so as to render such  | ||||||
| 11 | wastes
reusable or wastes received at a landfill and recycled  | ||||||
| 12 | through an Agency
permitted process bear a real and substantial  | ||||||
| 13 | difference from wastes not
resulting from or subject to such  | ||||||
| 14 | recycling, reclamation, or reuse and that
encouraging such  | ||||||
| 15 | recycling, reclamation or reuse furthers the purposes of
the  | ||||||
| 16 | Illinois Solid Waste Management Act;
 | ||||||
| 17 |  (10) that there are over 300 landfills in Illinois which  | ||||||
| 18 | are permitted to
accept only demolition or construction debris  | ||||||
| 19 | or landscape waste, the vast
majority of which accept less than  | ||||||
| 20 | 10,000 cubic yards per year. By
themselves these wastes pose  | ||||||
| 21 | only a minimal hazard to the environment when
landfilled in  | ||||||
| 22 | compliance with regulatory requirements in an
Agency-permitted  | ||||||
| 23 | site without commingling with other wastes and, as such,
 | ||||||
| 24 | landfills receiving only such wastes bear a real and  | ||||||
| 25 | substantial difference
from landfills receiving wastes which  | ||||||
| 26 | are
commingled. Disposal of these wastes in landfills permitted  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | for municipal
wastes uses up increasingly scarce capacity for  | ||||||
| 2 | garbage, general household
and commercial waste. It is the  | ||||||
| 3 | policy of the State to encourage disposal
of these wastes in  | ||||||
| 4 | separate landfills.
 | ||||||
| 5 |  (b) It is the purpose of this Act to reduce reliance on  | ||||||
| 6 | land disposal of
solid waste, to encourage and promote  | ||||||
| 7 | alternative means of managing solid
waste, and to assist local  | ||||||
| 8 | governments with solid waste planning and
management. In the  | ||||||
| 9 | interest of the public health, safety, and welfare, in order to  | ||||||
| 10 | conserve energy and natural resources, and to maintain and  | ||||||
| 11 | enhance job creation, and after consideration of the technical  | ||||||
| 12 | and economic feasibility, it is the policy of the State of  | ||||||
| 13 | Illinois to establish a comprehensive Statewide program for  | ||||||
| 14 | solid waste management which will preserve or enhance the  | ||||||
| 15 | quality of air, water, and land resources in accordance with  | ||||||
| 16 | the following preferred In furtherance of those aims, while  | ||||||
| 17 | recognizing that landfills
will continue to be necessary, this  | ||||||
| 18 | Act establishes the
following waste management hierarchy, in  | ||||||
| 19 | descending order of preference,
as State policy:
 | ||||||
| 20 |  (1) volume reduction at the source;
 | ||||||
| 21 |  (2) recycling and reuse;
 | ||||||
| 22 |  (3) recycling; combustion with energy recovery; 
 | ||||||
| 23 |  (4) composting or biological treatment; combustion for  | ||||||
| 24 | volume reduction;
 | ||||||
| 25 |  (5) recovering energy; and | ||||||
| 26 |  (6) disposal in landfill facilities or other approved  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | disposal methods.
 | ||||||
| 2 | (Source: P.A. 85-1440.)
 | ||||||
| 3 |  (415 ILCS 20/4.1 new) | ||||||
| 4 |  Sec. 4.1. State resources management plan. On or before  | ||||||
| 5 | December 1, 2016, the Illinois Sustainable Technology Center of  | ||||||
| 6 | the Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois  | ||||||
| 7 | shall publish a Statewide resource management plan, and shall  | ||||||
| 8 | update the plan every 5 years. The Illinois Sustainable  | ||||||
| 9 | Technology Center may obtain assistance from outside experts to  | ||||||
| 10 | assist in the preparation of the plan. The plan shall be  | ||||||
| 11 | developed with the assistance of a broad-based advisory  | ||||||
| 12 | committee. Funding for the plan shall be taken from the  | ||||||
| 13 | Illinois Solid Waste Management Fund. The plan shall include  | ||||||
| 14 | the following information: | ||||||
| 15 |   (a) An estimate, with 2014 as a base year, of the  | ||||||
| 16 |  amount and composition of waste disposed on a Statewide and  | ||||||
| 17 |  per capita basis, and development of a database of  | ||||||
| 18 |  permitted facilities and non-permitted facilities that  | ||||||
| 19 |  must notify the Agency, including landfills, garbage  | ||||||
| 20 |  transfer stations, landscape waste transfer stations,  | ||||||
| 21 |  composting sites, landscape waste land application sites,  | ||||||
| 22 |  construction and demolition debris recycling facilities,  | ||||||
| 23 |  and recycling facilities that process recyclables from  | ||||||
| 24 |  residential or commercial generators. In addition, an  | ||||||
| 25 |  estimate of the overall waste generation rate and how that  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  waste is managed after generation (amount reused,  | ||||||
| 2 |  recycled, composted, and disposed) as of 2014. It is  | ||||||
| 3 |  expected that the Department of Commerce and Economic  | ||||||
| 4 |  Opportunity waste characterization study conducted in 2014  | ||||||
| 5 |  will form the basis for this Section of the State plan. The  | ||||||
| 6 |  results of the 2014 Department of Commerce and Economic  | ||||||
| 7 |  Opportunity study should be compared to the 2009 study to  | ||||||
| 8 |  evaluate trends in composition of waste and material being  | ||||||
| 9 |  disposed. This comparison should lead to conclusions  | ||||||
| 10 |  regarding recommendations for diversion programs. It is  | ||||||
| 11 |  also recommended that the 2014 study be used by counties  | ||||||
| 12 |  when preparing their 5-year updates to develop or enhance  | ||||||
| 13 |  local programs to capture and divert materials identified  | ||||||
| 14 |  in the 2014 study.  | ||||||
| 15 |   (b) A common methodology for counties to use in  | ||||||
| 16 |  determining their
annual recycling and composting rate.  | ||||||
| 17 |  Included shall be a
recommendation that county plans  | ||||||
| 18 |  include identification of
facilities (at a minimum the name  | ||||||
| 19 |  of facility, geographic
location, and type of facility)  | ||||||
| 20 |  that accept recyclables and
organic material for  | ||||||
| 21 |  recycling, composting, or digestion from
the county, and  | ||||||
| 22 |  that this information be used to update and
augment the  | ||||||
| 23 |  database of facilities developed as part of the
State plan.  | ||||||
| 24 |   (c) A common methodology for counties to use in  | ||||||
| 25 |  determining their
annual waste disposal rate. Included  | ||||||
| 26 |  shall be a recommendation
that county plans include  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  identification of facilities (at a
minimum the name of the  | ||||||
| 2 |  facility, geographic location, and type
of facility) that  | ||||||
| 3 |  accept for transfer or final disposal
municipal waste from  | ||||||
| 4 |  the county, and that this information be
used to update and  | ||||||
| 5 |  augment the database of facilities
developed as part of the  | ||||||
| 6 |  State plan.  | ||||||
| 7 |   (d) Source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting  | ||||||
| 8 |  programs
that are applicable to counties with a population  | ||||||
| 9 |  of 200,000 or more. Specific recommendations should be  | ||||||
| 10 |  developed for residential programs (single family and  | ||||||
| 11 |  multi-family), commercial programs, and construction and  | ||||||
| 12 |  demolition debris programs. Each recommendation shall  | ||||||
| 13 |  include an estimate of the cost to implement the program,  | ||||||
| 14 |  how it will be funded, and an estimated timeframe for  | ||||||
| 15 |  implementation.  | ||||||
| 16 |   (e) Source reduction, reuse, recycling, and composting  | ||||||
| 17 |  programs that are applicable to counties with a population  | ||||||
| 18 |  of less than 200,000. Specific recommendations should be  | ||||||
| 19 |  developed for residential programs (single and  | ||||||
| 20 |  multi-family), commercial programs and construction and  | ||||||
| 21 |  demolition debris programs. Each recommendation shall  | ||||||
| 22 |  include an estimate of the cost to implement the program,  | ||||||
| 23 |  how it will be funded, and an estimated timeframe for the  | ||||||
| 24 |  implementation.  | ||||||
| 25 |   (f) A template for a 5-year plan update that can be  | ||||||
| 26 |  used by counties when submitting their 5-year updates to  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 |  the Agency.  | ||||||
| 2 |   (g) Education and public outreach programs that are  | ||||||
| 3 |  applicable to all counties. This should include an overall  | ||||||
| 4 |  education campaign strategy for counties (how to define the  | ||||||
| 5 |  target audience, what media to use, and how to allocate  | ||||||
| 6 |  resources), and development of an updated education  | ||||||
| 7 |  toolkit with sample flyers, press releases, radio ads,  | ||||||
| 8 |  recycling guidelines for recyclables, composting  | ||||||
| 9 |  guidelines for food scrap collection, website banners, and  | ||||||
| 10 |  similar materials.  | ||||||
| 11 |   (h) An assessment of the Department of Commerce and  | ||||||
| 12 |  Economic Opportunity waste characterization study  | ||||||
| 13 |  conducted in 2014 to form the basis of setting realistic  | ||||||
| 14 |  diversion goals over specified periods of time through  | ||||||
| 15 |  implementation of the methods and programs identified in  | ||||||
| 16 |  the State plan, where diversion goals will be determined  | ||||||
| 17 |  based on: (1) landfill disposal volumes to account for  | ||||||
| 18 |  source reduction and reuse, and (2) economically viable  | ||||||
| 19 |  commodity markets available to account for recyclable  | ||||||
| 20 |  materials.  | ||||||
| 21 |  The State goal is to meet diversion rates of 40% by 2020,  | ||||||
| 22 | 45% diversion by 2025, and 50% diversion by 2030 in counties  | ||||||
| 23 | with a population over 200,000 (as of 2010 census); 30%, 35%,  | ||||||
| 24 | and 40% respectively in counties with a population of 200,000  | ||||||
| 25 | or less.  | ||||||
| 26 |  The State plan shall also detail the specific  | ||||||
 
  | |||||||
  | |||||||
| 1 | responsibilities of the counties regarding implementation of  | ||||||
| 2 | the plan, and identify the future role the Agency, the  | ||||||
| 3 | Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity, and other  | ||||||
| 4 | State agencies have in assisting counties and the State to  | ||||||
| 5 | achieve the goals outlined in the State plan. The State plan  | ||||||
| 6 | should also provide a vision with recommended practices that  | ||||||
| 7 | may include residential curbside programs, voluntary industry  | ||||||
| 8 | initiatives, public/private partnerships, consumer education,  | ||||||
| 9 | product stewardship, and extended producer responsibility,  | ||||||
| 10 | disposal bans, mandatory recycling, zero waste approaches, and  | ||||||
| 11 | State government procurement, from which policy makers may  | ||||||
| 12 | consider what proposed programs may have merit for  | ||||||
| 13 | implementation in Illinois. The evaluation of which programs or  | ||||||
| 14 | practices have merit should be conducted pursuant to paragraph  | ||||||
| 15 | (4) of subsection (c) of Section 4 of the Solid Waste Planning  | ||||||
| 16 | and Recycling Act which requires "an evaluation of the  | ||||||
| 17 | environmental, energy, life cycle cost, and economic  | ||||||
| 18 | advantages and disadvantages" of the proposed programs. In  | ||||||
| 19 | addition, the State plan may include recommendations to  | ||||||
| 20 | Congress, such as product labeling, that will benefit State  | ||||||
| 21 | diversion plans. 
 | ||||||